Evolutionary dating flaws america american speed dating florida

Radiocarbon dating can easily establish that humans have been on the earth for over twenty thousand years, at least twice as long as creationists are willing to allow.Therefore it should come as no surprise that creationists at the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) have been trying desperately to discredit this method for years.Evolutionary theories cannot do what is claimed for them, even when given long ages in which to do it. As noted in the preceding major article in this Encyclopedia (), actual human records reveal that past time has been very short.—pp. Instead, only those dates are used which nicely support evolutionary theories. Evolutionists need long ages in order to pretend that their theories are true. There are three primary radioactive dating methods: (1) uranium-thorium-lead dating, (2) rubidium-strontium dating, and (3) potassium-argon dating. Each of these dating methods can only be accurate if each of the following assumptions always apply: 1: Nothing can contaminate the parent or daughter products during the process.Yet, without long ages, evolutionists cannot make their theories plausible. Whether or not scientific dating methods are accurate has nothing to do with whether evolutionary theories work. The laughable part is that the stated ages of the strata were hunched out in the nineteenth century, long before modern dating methods were discovered.—p. Yet all the non-historical dating methods are unreliable. In each system, the "parent" element decays to a "daughter" element, and a certain amount of time is supposed to elapse throughout the decay process.—pp. When something is in the ground for a long period of time, how can anyone be certain that this is true?The age they came back with was only a few thousand years old. And kept their theory that dinosaurs lived "millions of years ago" instead. They then use potassium argon, or other methods, and date the fossils again.This date did not fit the preconceived notion that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. They do this many times, using a different dating method each time.Yet, as we shall learn in this article, evolution teaches that, if given enough time, a cow (or some other mammal) will eventually swim out into the ocean and become a whale.—pp. 5: If any change occurred earlier in certain atmospheric conditions, this could profoundly affect radioactivity. 6: Any change in the Van Allen radiation belt would greatly affect the rates, and that could also have occurred.—pp. Each of these five problems is very, very likely to have occurred over past time, thus devastating the value of the computed dates: (1) Lead could originally have been mixed in with the parent substance.

What many do not realize is that carbon dating is not used to date dinosaurs. Carbon dating is only accurate back a few thousand years.

C) dating usually want to know about the radiometric[1] dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years.

People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history. Christians, by definition, take the statements of Jesus Christ seriously.

So, we have a “clock” which starts ticking the moment something dies.

Obviously, this works only for things which were once living.

Search for evolutionary dating flaws:

evolutionary dating flaws-47

Living organisms are constantly incorporating this C-14 into their bodies along with other carbon isotopes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “evolutionary dating flaws”